Iraq: Saddam Hussein verdict - Amnesty International deplores death sentences after unfair trial
Amnesty International deplores the decision of the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal to impose the death sentence on Saddam Hussein and two of his co-defendants after a trial which was deeply flawed and unfair.
Flaws in the trial process included:
- political interference undermined the independence and impartiality of the court, causing the first presiding judge to resign and blocking the appointment of another
- the court failed to take adequate measures to ensure the protection of witnesses and defence lawyers, three of whom were assassinated during the course of the trial
- Saddam Hussein was denied access to legal counsel for the first year after his arrest, and complaints by his lawyers throughout the trial relating to the proceedings do not appear to have been adequately answered by the tribunal.
Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Programme said:
“This trial should have been a major contribution towards establishing justice and the rule of law in Iraq, and in ensuring truth and accountability for the massive human rights violations perpetrated by Saddam Hussein’s rule. In practice, it has been a shabby affair, marred by serious flaws that call into question the capacity of the tribunal, as currently established, to administer justice fairly, in conformity with international standards.”
Justice will not served in Iraq if the verdict is left open to question because of serious flaws in the process. Urgent changes to the Tribunal Statute are needed before any other trials proceed.
Amnesty International opposes the use of the death penalty in all circumstances. It is the ultimate violation of the right to life, it is irreversible and it has been shown to have no deterrent effect. There is now the risk that Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants will be executed while doubts remain about whether they had a fair trial. In addition, the execution of Saddam Hussein will prevent others seeing him brought to justice for many thousands of human rights abuse cases.
Malcolm Smart continued:
“Every accused has a right to a fair trial, whatever the magnitude of the charge against them. This plain fact was routinely ignored through the decades of Saddam Hussein's tyranny. His overthrow opened the opportunity to restore this basic right and, at the same time, to ensure, fairly, accountability for the crimes of the past. It is an opportunity missed, and made worse by the imposition of the death penalty.”
Amnesty International will now follow closely the appeal stage, where the evidence as well as the application of the law can be reviewed, and the Special Tribunal has therefore an opportunity to redress the flaws of the previous proceedings. However, given the grave nature of these flaws, and the fact that many of them continue to afflict the current trial, Amnesty International urges the Iraqi government to seriously consider other options. These could include adding international judges to the tribunal, or referring the case to an international tribunal - an option indicated by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention last September.
- Find out more about our work against the Death Penalty
The former Iraqi dictator was sentenced on 5 November in connection with the killing of 148 people from al-Dujail village after an attempt to assassinate him there in 1982. The trial, which began in October 2005 almost two years after Saddam Hussein was captured by US forces, ended last July. The verdict was originally due to be announced on 16 October but was delayed because the court said it needed more time to review testimony.
Saddam Hussein is currently being tried by the Special Iraqi Criminal Tribunal, together with six others, on separate charges arising from the so-called Anfal campaign, when thousands of people belonging to Iraq's Kurdish minority were subject to mass killings, torture and other gross abuses in 1988. This trial has yet to conclude.