India: Amnesty demands a repeal of 'shoot on sight' orders
|
Posted: 14 August 2008 Amnesty International today (14 August 2008) called on the government of the Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir to rescind the order issued yesterday to authorise security forces to 'shoot on sight' in response to communal clashes in the town of Kishtwar. Kishtwar in the Doda district witnessed violent clashes between Hindus and Muslims on 12 August, where at least two people were killed as a result of alleged police firing. It is one of several towns in the state currently under curfew in the wake of protests that have left at least 28 people dead. Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific Director, said: 'Shoot on sight orders are a clear violation of the right to life and of international standards of law enforcement. The volatility of the situation in Jammu & Kashmir requires more sensitivity from the authorities, not a shoot on sight order.' Since the state government announced a proposal to transfer forest land from the state to the Amarnath Shrine Board on 26 May, in order to accommodate the annual Hindu pilgrimage at the Shrine, there have been a series of protests and counter protests that have grown increasingly violent. More public protests have been announced in the run up to Indian Independence Day tomorrow (15 August) by the All Party Hurriyat Conference (APHC), one of the largest predominantly Muslim political formations in Jammu and Kashmir. Sam Zarifi said: 'The Indian authorities should conduct investigations and bring to justice police officers, as well as protesters, in a quick, transparent, and fair way in order to cool down sectarian tension.' Amnesty International calls on the Government of India to ensure that it protects the right to life in accordance with its responsibilities under international law. This includes the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which it is a state party, and standards such as the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials and the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, which state that firearms should be used only when strictly unavoidable in order to protect life. Background
|

news blog